By Kabuye Ronald
The High Court in Kampala has terminated criminal proceedings against city lawyer Felix Kintu- Nteza who was accused of obtaining money by false pretense in regard to a disputed land transaction in Wakiso District.
Mr. Kintu was charged before Buganda Road Chief Magistrates Court in a case arising out of a 2013 disputed land transaction between the beneficiaries of the estate of the late George Kamya and Interlink Education Services Limited.
Justice Isaac Muwata of the High Court has stopped the criminal proceedings against Mr Kintu saying that there is already a pending civil case against vendors and their lawyer, Kintu with the same facts.
In 2014, Interlink Education Services sued 13 beneficiaries of the estate of late Kamya and Mr Kintu accusing them of breach of sales agreement to provide a land title and remove squatters from the disputed 15 acre land on block 220, plot 64 at Gimbo in Wakiso District.
In the case before the High Court, Interlink Education Services is also seeking a refund of Shs195m
Justice Muwata described the criminal case before the Magistrates Court as an abuse of the court process saying that the decision in the pending civil dispute would be sufficient to tell who the seller was and who is supposed to refund the said Shs195m “To avoid conflicting decisions in the High Court and the lower court, it is proper to stay the criminal proceedings,” ruled Justice Muwatta adding that the stay would enable the court to hear and determine civil matters which were filed in 2014.
Justice Muwata held that if allowed, the case in the lower court would prejudice Mr Kintu, who was the lawyer for the vendors in the disputed land transaction.
The High Court ruling resulted from a land transaction between the beneficiaries of the Late Kamya’s estate and Interlink Education Services who is accusing the lawyer of obtaining Shs195 million by falsely pretending to sell land whereas not.
Court documents show that the directors of Interlink filed a criminal complaint in 2022 against the seasoned lawyer after he declined to compel his clients led Abdul Sewaya who sold their interest in the land, to refund their money.
After the court, Mr Kintu said in an interview that the decision was a welcome remark because the case against him did not have legal basis and hence frivolous.
“I have been challenging that case because it was frivolous and only aimed at tarnishing me for reasons I do not know,” said Mr Kintu adding that the decision effectively terminates the criminal proceedings against him.
